Pillar 01 · Services

From fragmented telemetry to autonomous infrastructure.

We build the real-time telemetry, observability, and agentic operations layers that turn raw infrastructure data into autonomous decisions. Anchored in production deployments at T-Mobile and our own EdgeTelemetry product.

→ The problem

Modern data center operators, telecom networks, and infrastructure environments generate enormous volumes of telemetry — GPUs, hosts, cooling systems, power, network fabric, security events. The data exists, but it's fragmented across vendors, inconsistent in schema, and slow to become trusted and actionable.

The result: operators run blind during deployment, debug reactively rather than proactively, and can't move toward the autonomous operations that AI workloads demand. Capital sits idle. Incidents take hours instead of minutes. SREs burn out maintaining glue code between dashboards.

What we do

We design and build the unified telemetry, validation, and reasoning layers that turn this fragmented data into operational ground truth. Our work spans three phases, depending on where the customer is:

1. Unified telemetry & observability

Real-time ingestion from heterogeneous sources, schema normalization, validation logic, and the data infrastructure to make telemetry queryable at scale. Built on production-tested stacks: Kafka, Spark, Airflow, Flink, dbt, and modern data warehouses.

2. Real-time SIEM & threat detection

Distributed pipelines processing high-volume security and operational events with sub-second latency. Detection logic that scales horizontally. Improved mean-time-to-detect and reduced false positive rates through scalable analytics.

3. Agentic operations & autonomous remediation

Reasoning layers built on Claude that interpret telemetry, follow operational playbooks, execute remediation through tool use, and escalate appropriately to humans. The architecture pattern enterprises actually trust because it's defensible in front of safety, compliance, and reliability reviews.

→ Reference architecture

Telemetry → unified layer → reasoning → action.

The pattern we deploy across customers: heterogeneous source ingestion into a unified schema, validation and enrichment, a reasoning layer (typically Claude) that interprets state and executes playbooks via tool use, and clear human escalation paths.

Designed to evolve as the underlying models improve, not be rebuilt with each generation.

// pattern

01 · Source ingestion — GPU, host, cooling, power, network, security events. Ingested via Kafka, NiFi, or vendor APIs. No transformation at the edge.

02 · Unified schema — Normalization to a consistent operational schema. Validation, enrichment, lineage tracking. Stored in a real-time-queryable layer.

03 · Reasoning layer — Claude reasons over telemetry state, runbooks, and historical incidents. Anomaly explanation, root-cause hypothesis, remediation planning.

04 · Action & escalation — Tool-use execution of remediation playbooks. Audit trail. Human escalation with full context. Continuous evaluation.

01 · SOURCE INGESTION Heterogeneous inputs GPU · host · power · network Kafka · NiFi · vendor APIs 02 · UNIFIED SCHEMA Normalize & enrich validate · lineage · enrich real-time queryable layer 03 · REASONING LAYER Claude + runbooks anomaly · root-cause · plan historical incident context 04 · ACTION + ESCALATE Execute & audit playbooks · audit trail human escalation with context
weeks → hrs
Time from rack landing to operational status, via automated validation in EdgeTelemetry.
sub-sec
SIEM detection latency
Real-time threat detection at telco scale, processing high-volume security event data.
unified
Schema across vendors
One operational view across GPU, host, cooling, power, and network telemetry.
DehazeLabs' team's expertise in building, deploying, and managing AI agents revolutionized our network optimization and elevated customer service efficiency.
T-Mobile · Director, Technology Innovation
[ FAQ ]

Common questions about data center & infrastructure AI.

How long does it take to go from fragmented telemetry to a unified observability layer?
Most engagements reach a unified telemetry layer within 8–12 weeks. The first 4 weeks are source inventory, schema definition, and ingestion pipeline setup. Weeks 5–12 cover normalization, validation logic, and making the data queryable. Timeline depends on source heterogeneity and whether raw data access already exists.
What telemetry sources can you ingest — do you support heterogeneous GPU and cooling vendors?
Yes. Our EdgeTelemetry product and custom engagements both handle heterogeneous sources: GPU vendors (NVIDIA, AMD, custom ASICs), host metrics, power and cooling systems, network fabric, and security event streams. We ingest via Kafka, NiFi, vendor APIs, and SNMP/IPMI where needed. Normalization to a unified operational schema is part of the core architecture.
How does Claude fit into infrastructure agentic operations — what can it actually do autonomously?
Claude reasons over telemetry state, runbooks, and historical incident data. In practice it handles anomaly explanation, root-cause hypothesis generation, and remediation planning — then executes against a constrained tool set (restart services, update configs, file tickets, escalate with context). We build in explicit escalation thresholds so autonomous actions stay within agreed scope.
What does GPU rack onboarding automation actually look like in production?
Our EdgeTelemetry product handles GPU rack onboarding end-to-end: automated hardware validation on rack arrival, configuration checks, driver and firmware verification, network connectivity tests, and a structured handoff to operations. The process that previously took weeks of manual SRE effort is reduced to hours. The system generates a validated onboarding record that feeds downstream CMDB and monitoring systems.
Can you build on top of our existing SIEM, or do we need to replace it?
We build on top of existing infrastructure wherever practical. We've added reasoning layers and improved detection logic on top of Splunk, Elastic, Chronicle, and custom SIEM stacks. Replacement is only recommended when the underlying data infrastructure is the bottleneck — which is less common than clients expect.
What's a typical engagement size and team shape for data center AI work?
Typical engagements run $300K–$2.5M over 3–18 months. Team shape is an embedded model: a US-based technical lead who owns the relationship and architecture, supported by a South Asia engineering bench that handles execution. Most buyers are VP Engineering, CTO, or Head of SRE at data center operators, telecom networks, or infrastructure-heavy enterprises.

→ Related reading

AI for data center operators → AI for telecommunications → GPU rack onboarding automation → Agentic operations → Real-time SIEM pipeline → DehazeLabs vs Big 4 → DehazeLabs vs in-house AI team →

Building something operationally critical?

Tell us about your infrastructure roadmap. Initial conversations are free and frank — we'll tell you whether we're the right fit, and what we'd need to deliver if we are.